Anti-projectile net could protect soldiers

Original post: click here

Subscribe to these comments

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Neutral

Wwhat @ Sep 24th 2007 10:45PM

Those 400K missiles are bought in the good ol US of A and not in mexico or china, so that money just rotates within the US economy, what's lost is to some chemicals and electronics, and I think they actually rely largely on non-chinese parts for the electronics too.
So there is a loss to import from some chemicals but not even near the $400K asked for the rockets, nope, most of that money that's spent on ordinance lands in companies like those owned by cheney and bush's family..

Also all those calculations of how much the occupation/destabilization takes don't subtract the money the army would require when the soldiers were at home I bet, they get payed then too you know, and I don't think they subtract the normal running cost that would be spent anyway from the expense the iraq occupation/destabilization creates when they throw around figures. (I might be wrong though)

Not that it's not stupid and messy and pointless and creating more issues than solving them of course.

Add your comments

New Users

Name

E-mail

Current Users

E-mail:

Password

Remember Me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

replying to thread #7783335

Add your comments:

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.