[Z @ Sep 26th 2007 8:48AM]

*Yawns* Wake me up when they have truly landed a man on the moon.

[supermeerkat @ Sep 26th 2007 10:01AM]

So you don't think the moon landings happened, then?

[Z @ Sep 26th 2007 10:12AM]

So if you think on average 1.19 perfect photos per minute to be taken with the chest mounted cameras is possible (along with other experiment to be carried out) then by all means they very well did put a man or two on the moon.

http://www.aulis.com/skeleton.html

[supermeerkat @ Sep 26th 2007 11:05AM]

"As a matter of fact, a significant percentage of the lunar surface photographs are blurred, unfocused, incorrectly exposed, or otherwise flawed. These photos weren't generally known to the public until recently because they weren't interesting to editors and publishers of popular works and therefore not cost-effective to duplicate. "

http://www.clavius.org/photoqual.html

[Z @ Sep 26th 2007 11:22AM]

Right, last reply. Its time to move on.

http://www.aulis.com/jackstudies_4.html

[supermeerkat @ Sep 26th 2007 11:35AM]

"Central to the claims of many conspiracists is the notion that shadows must always appear parallel in sunlit photos, or at best exhibit only a very small amount of foreshortening."

http://www.clavius.org/trrnshdow.html

Examples of shadow angles

http://www.clavius.org/shad15.html

[Constable Odo @ Sep 26th 2007 12:02PM]

I'm still trying to figure out what really happened the the billions of dollars that were spent on those faked moon missions. I figured it must have gone into nuclear missile delivery systems and possibly nuclear stockpiles. Though I'm not too sure about that either since they said they created the stockpile and then destroyed it without anyone ever seeing it. The money may have possibly gone into Area 51 projects for stealth fighters and such.

There might be another US cash shortage again because there was some TV program showing that there might be a startup of moon landings again. This time to obtain some rare element or something that will give the world limitless energy. I think they also wanted to sell land on the moon to interested individuals. Talk about useless real estate. If there was gold, oil or diamonds on the moon, it would be fully populated by now no matter how many lives or dollars got used up.

Imagine spending billions of dollars for a moon landing and only getting a few rocks in return. Economically, that makes no sense at all. The US is always using up money without accountability to the general public.

Quick poll: How many of you want to take a free vacation on the moon?