Ok... this is great, this is awesome, more company's should do this.
What percentage of the individual stores power needs will be met via the solar power.
Because (and again: this is great, this is awesome, more company's should do this) if they're covering a TINY percentage of their needs and reaping HUGE PR points it kinda sucks.
As the article says, "Kohl's use of solar power will generate more than 35 million kilowatt-hours (kWh) of renewable energy annually, the equivalent of powering an estimated 3,087 California homes."
So yeah, unless a Kohl's store uses the equivalnet electricity to several thousand houses, they're generating a heck of a lot more than "a TINY percentage of their needs".
3,087 CA homes / 63 Kohls stores = 49 CA Homes per Kohls store. It isn't out of the realm of reality that this is accurate. The massive heating/cooling/lighting of each store could be equivalent to 49 homes.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Cameron @ Sep 27th 2007 6:54AM
Ok... this is great, this is awesome, more company's should do this.
What percentage of the individual stores power needs will be met via the solar power.
Because (and again: this is great, this is awesome, more company's should do this) if they're covering a TINY percentage of their needs and reaping HUGE PR points it kinda sucks.
zoara @ Sep 27th 2007 7:07AM
As the article says, "Kohl's use of solar power will generate more than 35 million kilowatt-hours (kWh) of renewable energy annually, the equivalent of powering an estimated 3,087 California homes."
So yeah, unless a Kohl's store uses the equivalnet electricity to several thousand houses, they're generating a heck of a lot more than "a TINY percentage of their needs".
scorp508 @ Sep 27th 2007 7:52AM
3,087 CA homes / 63 Kohls stores = 49 CA Homes per Kohls store. It isn't out of the realm of reality that this is accurate. The massive heating/cooling/lighting of each store could be equivalent to 49 homes.