Skip to Content
*If Rubik WERE smarterSubjunctive!
I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure was is correct, it's not subjunctive because it isn't an ongoing statement, if Rubik, in the past when he created the cube at one specific point in time (not ongoing), was smarter.Though I could be incorrect.
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Galen Troup @ Oct 19th 2007 8:15AM
*If Rubik WERE smarter
Subjunctive!
Orionrecon @ Oct 19th 2007 12:16PM
I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure was is correct, it's not subjunctive because it isn't an ongoing statement, if Rubik, in the past when he created the cube at one specific point in time (not ongoing), was smarter.
Though I could be incorrect.